Around June 23, 2026, the Bank of England finally consolidated the previous discussions on "systemic digital tokens" priced in pounds into a formal policy statement and draft code of conduct: the initial total issuance of every token identified as systemic must be capped at £40 billion, with the underlying reserves roughly maintaining a composition of "70% short-term UK government bonds + 30% Bank of England deposits," and redemption must be completed within 24 hours after the holder requests it without paying interest. Regulators are pulling digital tokens entirely into the order of traditional currency and government bonds while emphasizing in the statement that they will "support safe innovation under the premise of controlling risks," trying to let these products issued in the UK grow into a "trustworthy form of digital currency" that can stand alongside cash. Almost at the same time, former Robinhood Crypto Chief Operating Officer Tanya Denisova stepped in to join the digital token infrastructure company Agora as Chief Operating Officer and planned to transition to the licensed COO position at a national trust bank; the Japanese financial group SBI is preparing to launch the JPYSC digital token pegged to the yen, while Europe is paving the way for official digital currencies and private digital tokens through the parliamentary economic committee's approval of the digital euro regulatory proposal. The rules are set in writing, talent is migrating, the digital tracks of the pound, yen, and euro are simultaneously illuminated, and the global digital currency game is shifting from "who issues first" to "who firmly grasps the compliance framework and key figures first."
New Regulations on Pound Digital Tokens: Caps and Reserves
In this global digital race, the Bank of England chose to draw a clear red line for pound digital tokens. The latest draft sets an initial issuance cap of £40 billion for each type of pound-denominated digital token identified as "systemic," which is not a general size constraint on a single institution, but rather a ceiling for specific products. Alongside the cap is an extremely conservative reserve structure: about 70% must be invested in short-term UK government bonds, while the remaining approximately 30% must be deposited in accounts at the Bank of England, using high liquidity and low credit risk assets to firmly anchor these digital tokens within the traditional financial security framework. To further weaken their "deposit-like" attributes, the draft requires that products do not pay interest to holders but must support redemptions completed within 24 hours, embedding "pounds can be withdrawn at any time" into the rules, while the imagination of "holding can earn interest" is directly locked out.
The regulatory intentions behind these designs are not difficult to decipher: the Bank of England is attempting to find a fine line between payment system security and technological innovation, on one hand allowing pounds to circulate quickly in digital token form on the blockchain and in wallets, while on the other hand minimizing the probability of bank runs and systemic risk as much as possible. Previous regulatory discussion versions mentioned setting holding limits for individuals and companies — how many pounds of digital tokens each individual and company could hold — but according to unverified information, in the latest scheme, these hard constraints on end holders were lifted, instead, a cap was set on the overall issuance scale, placing "limitation" at the product level rather than restricting users' balances. This shift has been interpreted by the market as the UK slightly tilting towards competitiveness within compliance safeguards: it neither allows pound digital tokens to expand indefinitely into shadow deposit pools nor does it set up barriers for users that could scare off potential payment and application scenarios. This combination of "cap + reserve" represents a defensive starting posture chosen by the UK in the digital currency race.
From Robinhood to Agora: Betting on Compliant Payments
As the Bank of England delineates compliance boundaries for pound digital tokens with the "cap + reserve" combination, a certain group of people begins to choose sides. Tanya Denisova, who previously served as Chief Operating Officer at Robinhood Crypto, announced at this time that she would leave the front lines of retail trading to shift towards underlying compliance infrastructure — joining Agora as Chief Operating Officer and expected to become its Chief Operating Officer at a national trust bank, dependent on approval from the U.S. regulatory agency OCC. Robinhood Crypto has long provided crypto trading and custody services to a large number of retail users, navigating the toughest frontline of compliance operation and risk control, while Tanya was responsible for maintaining this high-frequency, complex retail process within the regulatory tolerance. Now she is extracting this experience from the frontend application and betting on a new base for payments and settlements.
Aora is offering her not another trading platform, but a digital payment network based on pounds that seeks to embed within the regulatory framework. It positions itself as an infrastructure company centered on pound-denominated digital tokens, aiming to build a compliant network under the rules of the UK and other major jurisdictions that meets regulatory expectations for 24-hour redemptions, capital security, and transparency in reserves, while also supporting daily retail and institutional payments and settlements. To operate within such a framework, understanding how to manage operational risks at the scale of millions of users, and how frontend behaviors evolve into regulatory metrics in the backend, is crucial, which is exactly where the value of Robinhood Crypto-like experience lies. Tanya's choice is almost synchronous with the release of the Bank of England's new regulations and is seen by many as a direct response to regulatory signals: at the juncture where the pound digital token path shifts from "discussing rules" to "can be implemented," operational talents with dual backgrounds in traditional finance and crypto business are proactively leaving trading-centered roles, betting their careers on the longer track of compliant digital payments and licensed banking.
Japan and Europe Enter the Arena: JPYSC and Digital Euro
As the UK writes the game rules into regulatory texts with a fine framework for pound digital tokens, Asia and Europe are quietly positioning themselves. Jinse Finance Evening News disclosed that Japan’s financial group SBI plans to launch the JPYSC, pegged to the yen, that week, which is a digital token product priced in yen, directly packaging traditional yen positions into a payment tool that can circulate on the blockchain. Previously, various pilot digital assets pegged to the yen already appeared in Japan, but remained at the "experimental stage" until a significant financial group like SBI got involved, allowing for the first opportunity for yen digital tokens to enter the mainstream payment sphere: one end connects domestic merchant acquisition and personal transfer scenarios in Japan, while the other envisions it as a new medium for cross-border settlements, finding new combinations between yen accounting and blockchain delivery for regional trade and capital flow.
In contrast to Japan's semi-official route led by large financial institutions, Europe has chosen a more direct legislative path. The European Parliament's economic committee has approved regulatory proposals relevant to the digital euro, laying the institutional foundation for the future digital euro issued by the European Central Bank for the public. The core demand of the proposal is not complex: in the context of increasing fragmentation in the global payment system, the digital euro must first defend the payment sovereignty of the eurozone, and secondly strengthen the basic payment network at the retail level, while clearly delineating legal boundaries to distinguish the digital euro from commercial bank deposits and various private digital tokens and crypto assets, avoiding opaque crowding out effects of new central bank products on existing financial intermediaries. At this same time dimension, the UK locks the pound digital token with issuance caps, reserve structures, and redemption rules, Japan promotes yen digital tokenization by SBI, and the EU advances digital euro legislation, all of which collectively present a multipolar pattern: rules and products are no longer defined by a single jurisdiction but form three parallel yet interlocking competitive routes among central banks, giant financial groups, and private digital token ecosystems.
Tightened Regulation or Opportunity Window?
From the perspective of London’s financial district, the "£40 billion" initial issuance cap and nearly textbook reserve structure imposed on the pound digital token by the Bank of England is a deliberately tightened gate. The draft requires about 70% of reserves to be short-term UK government bonds, about 30% to be central bank deposits, and then adds the rule of completing redemptions within 24 hours without paying interest to holders. Many comments from within the industry explicitly state that this means the product will be difficult to scale up and compete with similar global tools in terms of revenue models. These voices come from the deductions of research institutions and market participants, awaiting practical verification, but have already formed a comparison: Japan entrusts the JPYSC to large financial groups like SBI to digest risks within their existing group maps; the EU pushes for digital euro legislation driven by the central bank, firmly locking innovation onto an official track. The UK's choice to allow private entities to explore pound digital tokens within a strict framework appears particularly conservative compared to Japan's "group coverage" and the EU's "central bank taking on all responsibilities."
The regulator's calculations are entirely different. Not paying interest on pound digital tokens is essentially aimed at deliberately weakening their attractiveness as a substitute for traditional deposits, to avoid funds transforming into significant "shadow deposits" after wide migration in the payment field. Once high-frequency payment tools possess both yield and liquidity advantages, their impact on commercial banks and money market funds would not only be a technical competition but also a liability reconstruction, which is the underlying logic for the design of such strict reserves and redemption rules. For enterprises, this undoubtedly raises compliance costs and compresses product imagination space but also offers a very limited yet highly certain compliance track: whoever first completes a "central bank acceptable" version in licensing, custody, and clearing infrastructure will have the opportunity to become the long-term hub for pound digital payments. Former Robinhood Crypto COO Tanya Denisova joining Agora to serve as an operational hub for a company transitioning to a national trust bank is a reflection of this judgment — in the tightening gaps of regulation, those truly willing to bet on compliant infrastructure are seizing a piece of hard-to-replace digital payment high ground with policy certainty.
Next Steps: The Formation Path of Digital Currency Order
If we place the actions of the UK, Japan, and Europe on the same timeline, we can see distinctly different paths pointing towards the same goal. The Bank of England chooses to start with pegged pounds, digital tokens of systemic importance, utilizing each product's £40 billion issuance cap, a reserve structure of 70% short-term government bonds and 30% Bank of England deposits, and stipulations of 24-hour redemptions without interest to embed "payment security" into asset-side and liquidity constraints. Meanwhile, Japan, driven by SBI, promotes the issuance of the JPYSC, leveraging the resources and credit of a financial group to push yen digital tokenization into a new phase, while the EU allows the regulatory proposals for the digital euro to pass through the parliamentary economic committee, reserving an institutional track for the future issuance of central bank digital currencies. There are top-down legislative paths, bottom-up product testing, and approaches like the UK's detailed depiction of business boundaries through codes of conduct, but all three work under the same premise: only by locking risk within a framework can innovation truly scale in payment scenarios. The real uncertainty lies within the execution layer: how the consulting feedback on the UK policy statement and draft code of conduct will reshape the texts, whether local regulatory agencies will adjust reserve structures and redemption rhythms when implementing details, and how enterprises will rewrite product designs and business models under the constraints of "no interest" and issuance caps, are all still unresolved variables. Competing with regulation is the migration of talent and capital — shifting from front-end trading platforms to compliant infrastructures and licensed banks, from core operational roles like Tanya Denisova to companies like Allium that provide tools for on-chain data and compliance analysis, positioning themselves in advance for the future order through financing and expansion. Over the years, a more likely scenario is not one mode dominating the world but the parallel existence of central bank digital currencies and compliant fiat-backed tokens, with surrounding technology, data, and regulatory service layers being continuously reinforced, ultimately shaping the new normal of global digital currency slowly but firmly through the talents and capital flowing into compliant infrastructures.
Join our community, let’s discuss together, and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
