June 25, 2024, is a market-emphasized inflection point: on one side, Stifel lowered the target price for ON Semiconductor from $107 to $90, dousing expectations for demand in the automotive and industrial sectors; on the other side, Nokia gained nearly $30 million in investment in AI infrastructure and advanced semiconductor packaging in the U.S. and received public support from Trump, seeing a nearly 3% rise in pre-market share price to $14.21, making it one of the few tech stocks actively pursued by funds that day under the backdrop of industrial return and semiconductor self-sufficiency policies. In the same day, npm was reported to have 23 malicious packages affecting 408 GitHub repositories through the binding.gyp attack path, and combined with npm’s status as one of the largest software package repositories globally, once again brought the security of the open-source supply chain into the spotlight; meanwhile, on the regulatory side, out of around 1,200 companies applying for MiCA licenses, only 231 were approved, with a pass rate of less than 20%. This quantitative result highlights the high-pressure compliance threshold imposed by the EU on cryptocurrency businesses, directly determining who can legally conduct business in the 27 member states. On a macro level, reports indicated that the U.S. State Department and Israel were advancing troop withdrawal-related actions, easing some geopolitical tensions, lowering risk premiums, and providing a somewhat stabilizing sentiment for tech and crypto assets. Within the same timeframe, tightening compliance, supply chain attacks, and political backing for tech stocks appeared concurrently, while key data pointed simultaneously toward rising risk appetite and heightened security anxiety, also setting the tone for the subsequent analysis of the intrinsic structure behind the “June 25 Effect” through the three main threads of fund flows, regulatory thresholds, and technological security.
ON Semiconductor's target price cut: Semiconductor boom hits the brakes
Contrasting with the easing geopolitical risks and Nokia's political endorsement, around June 25, 2024, investment bank Stifel lowered ON Semiconductor's target price from $107 to $90, offering a more conservative judgment on the price space for this key supplier of automotive and industrial semiconductors. The significant cut in target price essentially rewrites future profit and valuation assumptions in the public model, signaling that “previous growth expectations were overly optimistic and need to be retracted.”
As ON Semiconductor's shipments are tightly anchored to automotive and industrial scenarios, its fundamentals are viewed as one of the barometers for related downstream demand. Stifel’s action is, in fact, a reevaluation of the intensity of these two major terminal demands: automotive and industrial chains do not have a linear upward trajectory, and there is a possibility of downward revisions for orders and capital expenditure. In this series of multiple events on June 25, lowering ON Semiconductor's target price provided a “brake” sample for the sentiment in the tech sector, indicating that some semiconductor sub-sector growth stories need to be discounted while simultaneously projecting more restrained allocation signals to the funding side against the backdrop of overall risk appetite being buoyed by political and macro positive factors.
Npm exposes malicious packages again: Open-source supply chain becomes an invisible minefield
Around June 25, amidst ongoing fluctuations regarding valuation and policy, the npm malware incident disclosed by the Slow Fog Security team refocused funding perspectives back to the foundational risks of the tech stack. In this incident, the attacker did not use obvious scripts; instead, they utilized pre-configured binding.gyp files to “embed” malicious logic into the build process: when developers executed common npm commands, the binding configurations would be automatically called, thereby executing malicious actions without any awareness. After investigation, a total of 23 malicious packages were discovered, already affecting 408 GitHub repositories, indicating that as long as one dependency node is contaminated, the entire upstream open-source ecosystem could passively suffer “guilt by association.”
As one of the world’s largest software package repositories, npm has long been a target for open-source supply chain attacks, but this incident exposed not only the old issues on the platform side but also systemic weaknesses at the developer behavior level—insufficient account security defense and a lack of scrutiny regarding the sources and changes of dependency packages, repeatedly proving to be critical links in amplifying risks. For crypto and blockchain projects that heavily rely on the npm ecosystem, these risks transcend the realm of “traditional software security,” directly penetrating into key touchpoints like wallets, node services, and front-end interactions. Once breached, the attack surface and scale of loss will far exceed the pollution of code in a single repository, making the controllability of the npm supply chain a necessary prerequisite for assessing long-term security for project parties and investors.
Less than 20% pass rate for MiCA licenses: Compliance threshold weighs on crypto companies
Apart from the technical side supply chain risks, the regulatory “compliance threshold” is reshaping the industry landscape in a more decisive manner. Earlier, the EU implemented what is referred to as the world’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, MiCA, and initiated a unified license application process. By approximately the first half of 2024, over 1,200 companies had submitted applications for MiCA licenses, but only 231 companies were ultimately approved, resulting in a pass rate of less than 20%. With less than one in five approval results, this converts the previously abstract impression of “high-standard regulation” into a quantifiable survival threshold: the vast majority of applicants were blocked in the initial screening, showing that regulatory agencies executed scrutiny standards far above the industry average regarding capital adequacy, internal control systems, risk management, and information disclosure.
The approved 231 companies mean they can legally provide relevant cryptocurrency business in all 27 EU member states, equivalent to receiving an operational passport covering a single market; entities that did not receive licenses must face the pressure of business contraction, structural migration, or even direct exit from the EU market. For companies that originally relied on a model of “multi-local exemptions + regulatory arbitrage,” MiCA compresses the previously dispersed regulatory differences into a hard red line: either restructure compliance and risk control according to EU unified high standards, or proactively shift the focus of future growth out of this market. As these licensing issuance data were gradually digested by the market around June 25, MiCA ceased to be merely a symbolic label of a “global first comprehensive framework,” but rather determined where capital, talent, and technology would concentrate among the institutions with the strongest compliance capabilities.
Nokia gains Trump endorsement: AI and packaging story ignites stock price
In contrast to the EU raising compliance thresholds with MiCA, the U.S. market on June 25 provided a form of “policy-backed growth story.” Nokia was reported to be advancing an investment of about $30 million in advanced semiconductor packaging and AI infrastructure in the U.S., and although a specific timetable has not been disclosed, the signal strength was amplified by Trump’s public endorsement. The mainstream market interpretation is that this statement equates to an “official endorsement” of Nokia’s transition route from consumer electronics to AI infrastructure and advanced packaging, directly embedding it into the bipartisan consensus of U.S. industrial policy promoting the return of manufacturing and semiconductor self-sufficiency.
From a funding perspective, this narrative quickly materialized on the board. On June 25, 2024, pre-market, Nokia's share price rose nearly 3%, reaching $14.21, providing a stark contrast to the reduced target price for ON Semiconductor, the npm supply chain security incident, and MiCA’s low approval rate on the same day. For investors, this was not just a medium-scale capital expenditure project, but a composite signal of “U.S. domestic manufacturing + advanced semiconductor packaging + AI infrastructure + political endorsement,” significantly boosting risk appetite toward related sectors against the backdrop of manufacturing return and semiconductor self-sufficiency.
From troop withdrawal to high-pressure compliance: Risk appetite re-priced amidst multiple signals
In the timeframe of June 25, the U.S. State Department and Israel advanced troop withdrawal-related actions, weakening previous geopolitical tensions and providing a “macro-level noise reduction” for global tech and crypto asset risk premiums, theoretically lowering the downside hedge costs of risk assets. However, on a micro level, Stifel lowered ON Semiconductor's target price from $107 to $90, npm’s ecosystem being exposed to 23 malicious packages affecting 408 GitHub repositories, and MiCA approving only 231 out of over 1,200 applicants with a pass rate of under 20%, simultaneously raised the risk premium across three dimensions: “sustainability of growth, security of tech stack, and compliance attainability.” In contrast, supported by about $30 million of U.S. domestic investment plans and Trump’s public backing, Nokia's shares rose nearly 3% to $14.21 that day, reflecting a higher pricing by funds for the combination of “policy endorsement + industrial upgrade + domestic manufacturing,” embodying a rebalancing between safety nets and aggressive positioning. The convergence of geopolitical easing, regulatory tightening, supply chain vulnerabilities, and political backing for tech stocks all on the same day compelled the market to simultaneously price hedging demand and growth imagination, with the new risk appetite center gradually shifting from indiscriminate chasing of high beta toward tech and crypto assets that are within compliance thresholds, verifiable in infrastructure security, and supported by policy.
Join our community, let’s discuss and get stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
