On September 14, 2026, the Hong Kong police publicly reported a fraud case involving a cryptocurrency investment platform: a local man in his seventies, under layers of deception from scammers posing as "professional advisors" and a fake investment app, opened a cryptocurrency wallet, purchased and transferred assets like USDT and ETH, ultimately losing over 13 million Hong Kong dollars. The victim saw his "account" continuously profiting on the app and believed he had seized the opportunity of the cryptocurrency investment boom, only to realize when he attempted to withdraw funds—multiple times rejected—that the promised high exchange rates, low fees, and instant withdrawals were merely carefully laid traps. Even more concerning for the police, this was not an isolated incident: during the same period, police received over 40 reports of investment fraud cases in just one week, accumulating losses of over 50 million Hong Kong dollars, and had issued a risk warning to the public about the scams associated with cryptocurrency investment platforms, reminding that these new tactics are particularly targeting inexperienced individuals with low risk tolerance. The following analysis will focus on this specific case, detailing how scammers exploit the cryptocurrency investment boom to precisely target elderly victims and attempting to reconstruct how vulnerable groups are gradually driven into the abyss in this web of technology and greed.

Stranger’s WhatsApp number leads an elderly man step by step into the trap

The starting point was merely a seemingly ordinary phone call. The scammer first contacted this seventy-year-old Hong Kong man through a stranger's WhatsApp account, claiming to be a "cryptocurrency investment" expert from Singapore, creating an image of a professional financial advisor through his profile picture, introduction, and the materials he sent. After a few days of small talk, the scammer began promoting a so-called cryptocurrency investment platform, repeatedly emphasizing "high exchange rates, low fees, instant withdrawals," and packaged it as a premium channel exclusively for regular customers, implying that anyone willing to try could see considerable returns in a short time with a small amount of funds.

To allay the elderly man's concerns about technological operations, the scammer proactively offered "one-on-one remote guidance," teaching him step by step how to set up a cryptocurrency wallet, explaining how to purchase USDT and ETH on the trading platform, and instructing him to transfer assets to a designated address provided by the scammer. After completing each step, the scammer would confirm in a professional manner that the "operation was correct" and "the funds had arrived," and then instructed him to download and log into a fake investment app. The app interface appeared simple and decent, with the account page clearly showing investment positions and trends, and the amounts continuously "increasing" over the next few days, creating the illusion that these USDT and ETH were silently earning profits for him. Seeing the accumulating numbers on the screen, the elderly man gradually let his guard down, adding funds multiple times until the total investment exceeded ten million. The real turning point came when he attempted to "withdraw anytime" as promised: regardless of whether it was a small test withdrawal or a request for a one-time redemption, the platform either refused for various reasons or simply could not process the withdrawal request, leaving the numbers in his account as unrealizable illusions, making him realize that the so-called "experts," "platform," and "profits" had been meticulously designed traps from the very beginning.

High exchange rates and low fees: how to breach the defenses of an elderly man in his seventies

For this seventy-year-old man, entering the so-called "cryptocurrency investment platform" was not about speculation, but rather a continuation of his usual steady investment approach: in the reality of limited retirement income and meager bank interest, how to prevent decades of savings from being eroded by inflation while maintaining access for living and healthcare expenses. The scammers capitalized on this psychological gap between safety and profit—an elderly person with limited understanding of cryptocurrency and related technologies is more likely to view "knowledgeable individuals" as safe alternatives, entrusting complex new tools to self-proclaimed "cryptocurrency investment experts."

The promises of high exchange rates, low fees, and instant withdrawals were packaged into a seemingly thoughtful solution: high exchange rates corresponded to the temptation of "earning a bit more when money is put in," low fees alleviated his concerns about additional costs, while the guarantee of "instant withdrawals" precisely addressed the elderly group's anxiety about liquidity, misleading them into believing they were dealing with a financial product that could both preserve value and generate profits without locking up cash flow. Under the guidance of the scammer, he step by step set up a cryptocurrency wallet, purchased USDT and ETH, and transferred them to the specified address, all while having almost no ability to verify whether the platform was real or if the wallet permissions were secure, nor understanding the irreversible technical logic of blockchain transactions once completed. The police categorized the case as investment fraud, which also highlighted a larger reality: in the highly asymmetrical and steeply technical cryptocurrency world, elderly individuals lack the experience to discern between legitimate and illegitimate platforms and lack the tools to independently verify the so-called "expert" and promises, this dual weakness makes it difficult for them to extricate themselves in time before losses spiral out of control.

Forty scams in one week: a warning on over 50 million Hong Kong dollars being lost

This case of an elderly man losing over 13 million to a fake cryptocurrency app is not an isolated tragedy but a typical slice of a wave of investment fraud in the past week. The police revealed that within the same time frame, they received over 40 reports of investment fraud, with total losses exceeding 50 million Hong Kong dollars in just one week. The methods involved range from traditional "financial plans" and "high-interest investments" to cryptocurrency platforms masquerading as "digital assets" and "blockchain wealth management," with various scams intertwined, leading the police to regard this type of case as a key risk on the current public safety map.

Among these numbers and cases, the cryptocurrency asset platform scam has been publicly singled out by the police, both because of the large sums involved and because it clearly illustrated how the elderly fall victim under the dual lure of cryptocurrency rhetoric and fake apps. In their report, the police not only outlined the overall scale of losses over the past week but also specifically issued a risk warning about scams related to cryptocurrency investments, urging citizens to be highly alert when faced with similar "expert recommendations" promising "high exchange rates, low fees, and instant withdrawals." For the police, this case represents not only a statistic on a report but also serves as a clear warning to the public that investment fraud is rapidly surfacing, particularly the risks associated with cryptocurrency platforms are accumulating swiftly.

USDT and ETH as tools of fraud: more covert cross-border transfers

The reason scammers target USDT (Tether) and ETH (Ethereum) in such cases is not coincidental. Both are among the most commonly supported mainstream cryptocurrencies on trading platforms and wallets, almost any common wallet can directly send and receive them, and they can be used interchangeably in applications across different regions, perfectly meeting the scammer's needs for "cross-border" and "high-tech investment" packaging. For the victims, as long as they follow the scammer’s remote guidance to set up a wallet on their phone, purchase USDT and ETH, and transfer them to the designated address, it feels like participating in a seemingly legitimate investment platform covering multiple countries, while their assets have actually been removed from their control and sent directly to a blockchain account controlled by the scammer.

Even more misleading is that the scammers do not let the victims see the straightforward fact of "transferring to a personal address," but instead packaged everything as an "investment account" interface through the fake app: the USDT and ETH transfers already completed on the blockchain are disguised within the app as "funding successful" and "profit settled," with constantly moving profit figures obscuring the reality that the funds have already been transferred away. Both the police and media have noted an increasing trend of using cryptocurrency assets as tools in these types of cross-border scams, with ordinary investors facing risks not just about whether they will lose money on a single platform, but also that if they trust the addresses and applications provided by the scammers, they may unknowingly complete cross-border fund transfers, later discovering that the so-called "account balance" was never really in their hands.

False profits amplify temptation: withdrawal rejections reveal the real scam

This case highlights several highly representative warning signals. First, there are "experts descending from the sky": scammers actively add friends through unfamiliar WhatsApp accounts, claiming to be "cryptocurrency investment experts" from Singapore. Such unverified identities, eager to promote so-called investment platforms, already represent a high risk. Second, there are promises far exceeding conventional offers: high exchange rates, low fees, and instant withdrawals with profit terms clearly better than most financial products on the market, yet scarcely mentioning the sources of risk and the platform's qualifications. This type of rhetoric, which only speaks of benefits and not costs, often indicates that there is no real, compliant investment business behind it.

Even more concealed and deadly is the moment when the funds are completely handed over to the other party. In the case, the victim purchased USDT and ETH as instructed by the scammer and transferred them to a single or few addresses provided by the scammer, ostensibly for "unified operation," but in reality placing the assets directly under their control. The fake app initially showed continuous profits, making the victim see rising numbers and naturally inducing him to continue adding funds, only to be rejected or delayed for technical reasons when he attempted a withdrawal, revealing the true scam at that point. The Hong Kong police have already warned the public that if they encounter strangers promoting high-yield cryptocurrency investments, requesting that assets be concentrated into specified addresses, or platforms unable to verify their qualifications while still encouraging further investments, the safest course of action is to immediately cease operations, retain relevant records, and seek police assistance as soon as possible.

After police warnings, what line can Hong Kong still defend?

The moment this case was publicized, the challenges facing Hong Kong extend far beyond the loss of 13 million by a seventy-year-old man. Scammers can cross borders masquerading as "Singapore cryptocurrency investment experts," using USDT, ETH, and fake apps to weave profit illusions, while directing funds into their specified addresses. However, regulation and law enforcement must chase after evolving technology. The police have publicly exposed scams related to cryptocurrency investment and issued risk warnings, but in the backdrop of these cases surfacing, maintaining the bottom line requires not only combating crime but also addressing the public education gap—especially enabling the elderly to truly understand what a cryptocurrency wallet is, what an address is, and what it means for a platform to lack verifiable qualifications. Moving forward, whether police outreach can become normalized, whether cross-border collaboration can be smoother, and whether stronger self-regulation and recognition mechanisms can be established within the industry will directly impact whether Hong Kong retail investors can timely recognize risks and protect their capital when faced with the next "high-yield cryptocurrency investment" pitch.

Join our community to discuss together and grow stronger!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。