Recently settled U.S. midterm elections are not merely a simple red-blue map redraw, but a reshuffling about responsibility attribution and power redistribution. The Democratic Party seized 7 Senate seats originally held by Republicans, with 4 new faces recognized as supporters of cryptocurrency; however, the total number of crypto-friendly members dropped slightly from 52 to 51 before the election. This indicates that "supporting crypto" is no longer a label of a single party, but will be repriced in more complex bipartisan transactions. The political game during the election was instantly pulled into the market: according to public data, Polymarket accurately predicted 98.4% of the settled midterm election options, while Kalshi's related market had a daily trading volume of up to $729 million, about three times the daily trading volume for the 2024 presidential election. The prediction market, in an almost "real voting" manner, forced the traditional political landscape to confront the constraints of probability and price. Shortly after the election, global risk assets also provided their answers— the cryptocurrency fear and greed index rebounded from 34 to 50, emotions shifted from panic to neutral, U.S. stock AAOI dropped 7.35%, Korea's KOSPI index opened down 1.82%, SK Hynix fell 6%, and Samsung Electronics decreased 3%, creating a subtle hedge between emotional recovery and the pressure on the tech sector. One side is the reshuffling of Senate seats and crypto stances, while the other is the rapid repricing of prediction markets and tech stocks. The election results are slowly but continuously releasing chain reactions through three paths: reordering of policy agendas, adjustments in regulatory priorities, and reassessing global risk preferences.
Republicans Hold Hegseth Accountable: Trump's Influence Tested Again
The cost of electoral defeat was quickly detailed into a string of "accountability chains" within the Republican Party. After the Democrats took 7 Senate seats formerly controlled by the Republicans, the hawks in the Republican Party first targeted Defense Secretary Hegseth, believing he played a major role in persuading Trump to attack Iran without presenting a clear exit strategy, making voters see both a reckless side and a result that appeared out of control. House Republicans are expected to vote for Hegseth's impeachment in a few days, transforming a defeat in the election into a concentrated reckoning of security decisions during the Trump era, seemingly to correct the national security path, but in essence, redefining which elements of the "Trump legacy" can be inherited and which must be cut.
Simultaneously ongoing is Trump’s response to this reckoning. In his first public appearance after the defeat, he chose to inspect the construction site of the White House banquet hall but avoided discussing the election results, signaling both a deliberate silence to evade direct responsibility and an implication that he remains an important player on the power stage. Hegseth has been placed on the accountability stage, impeachment proceedings have accelerated recently, and Trump's return in this manner constitutes a set of complex political signals: the Republican Party aims to reshape its image on security and foreign policy by sacrificing a core member of the security team while maintaining a connection with Trump’s base. In this process, policy agendas including crypto are likely to be reordered—security and foreign gaming placed in a priority position, while crypto regulation and legislative discussion may be more easily integrated into the narrative framework of "national security," indicating that discussions on security, foreign policy, and crypto regulation in the U.S. will unfold more beneath the shadows of internal party power redistribution in the coming time.
Senate Crypto Supporters Reduce to 51: Minor Bipartisan Adjustments
At the same time that security and foreign policy issues regain priority, the Senate's "crypto map" has also quietly adjusted. Bitwise analyst Camran Khosravi's statistics show that the total number of senators supporting crypto fell from 52 to 51 before the election. On the surface, it appears to be a minor setback for the camp, but the structural changes are worth dissecting. The Democrats reclaimed 7 seats previously controlled by Republicans in the Senate, among which 4 winners are recognized as supporters of crypto, indicating that even in the context of seat changes and internal party route reshuffles, the proponents of crypto no longer concentrate within a single party but present a more dispersed layout within both parties.
This "slight reduction but more bipartisan" adjustment does not simply lead to negative or positive implications for the legislative outlook. On one hand, in an atmosphere where crypto is more likely to be integrated into the national security framework, the presence of bipartisan supporters reduces the possibility of crypto policies being crudely simplified as security threats; on the other hand, the slight decrease in the number of supporters reminds the market that what truly drives legislation is not just the "crypto-friendly" labels on senators but also their influence in security, financial, and technological committees. Meanwhile, according to AiCoin data, the cryptocurrency fear and greed index recently rebounded from 34 to 50, emotions shifted from panic to neutral, indicating that the market did not respond with extreme emotions after seeing the "slight weakening of the crypto camp but a more dispersed map," but rather reevaluated the predictability of future regulatory paths. This resembles a process where policy expectations and market sentiments are recalibrated within the same time window.
98.4% Accuracy Rate of Prediction Markets Impacts Polls
If the post-election sentiment is about "calibrating expectations," then what truly helps the market achieve this calibration is not instant analysis from television stations, but a seemingly marginal prediction market. After the midterm elections, Polymarket disclosed that among its settled popular options, an astonishing 98.4% of predictions were correct: hitting 419 outcomes, with only 7 contrary to the final results, and another 78 still pending settlement. This report card almost proclaims one thing with data—when elections are dismantled into tradable event contracts, funds, information, and emotions are forced to aggregate more efficiently, coming closer to the median of "collective wisdom" than a limited sample survey.
On another front, Kalshi's event contracts designed around the midterm elections reached a daily trading volume of $729 million shortly after election confirmation, about three times the daily trading volume for the 2024 U.S. presidential election. According to attention from Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang and public data, this figure itself has become a signal from an institutional perspective: prediction contracts are no longer just "gambling" for retail investors; they can be seriously regarded as macro and political risk hedging tools. The markets surrounding the election results are increasingly seen as new information aggregators, one end connecting with the sample bias and narrative framework of traditional polling often facing skepticism, and the other end connecting with already mature contracts and on-chain tools in the crypto world—from on-chain settlement prediction platforms to structured products locking in event outcomes with smart contracts, election prediction markets are pushing the measurement of public opinion in the "survey era" toward a new paradigm supported by contracts, addresses, and real-time trading data.
AAOI and KOSPI: Post-Election Tech Growing Pains
On the other end of the election contract settlement is the reality balance sheet of tech stocks. Following the confirmation of the election results, according to AiCoin data, the entire segment of U.S. stocks related to optical communications and semiconductors is under pressure: AAOI fell 7.35%, SNDK dropped 10.3% to 1020.62 USDT, and AXTI fell 10.1% to 47.03 USDT. These companies carry the underlying demand for data centers and high-speed optical interconnects. When Washington’s power map is rearranged and expectations for fiscal and industrial policy are reassessed, the market first chooses to "reduce holdings" in these subjects close to computing infrastructure, projecting post-election uncertainty directly onto the stock prices of optical communications and semiconductors.
At the same time, Asian tech stocks responded correspondingly. The Korean KOSPI index opened down 1.82%, SK Hynix plunged 6%, and Samsung Electronics declined 3%; in domestic and Hong Kong stock-related contracts, Changxin Technology dropped about 2%, the STAR 50 went against the trend rising about 2%, Yushu Technology fell about 0.67%, Minimax dropped about 1.92%, and Zhipu fell about 1.24%. From silicon wafers, storage to optical modules, and then to AI applications and robotics, the entire chain is synchronously experiencing post-election growing pains between U.S. stocks, Korean stocks, and Chinese concept stocks. However, deep within this transmission path, long-term supply constraints remain clear: analyst Serenity believes that even if data center construction slows down and overall demand decreases by 20%-30%, high-spec lasers may still remain in long-term shortage. She cites NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's judgment that as CPO architecture scales, the use of optical devices will rise to 15 times the current amount. The short-term cooling expectations for demand and the narrative of long-term supply pressure are continuously tugging in tech stock valuations.
The Game After the Election Is Not Over: Crypto Legislation and Tech Cycle Observation List
The end of the election is just the beginning of the game: within the Republican Party, the defeat is directed at Hegseth, the anticipated impeachment vote and reassessment of Trump's political influence constitutes the first observation line for the coming weeks; the Senate's crypto-friendly camp slightly decreased from 52 to 51, with existing supporters among new Democratic senators, indicating that the pace of advancing cryptocurrency-related legislation will reflect a more typical bipartisan tug-of-war. The second line comes from the leap in prediction markets: among Polymarket's settled popular election options, 98.4% of predictions were correct, and Kalshi's daily trading for the midterm elections reached $729 million, far exceeding that for presidential elections. The resulting discussions on regulatory frameworks and innovations in contract design will have long-term effects on how on-chain contracts are embedded in the pricing of public events. The third line is the fluctuation of the tech capital expenditure cycle: according to AiCoin data, AAOI, SNDK, AXTI, and Korea’s KOSPI-related tech and semiconductor stocks obviously suffered post-election pressure, but in the narratives of analysts Serenity and Jensen Huang, high-spec lasers and the optical devices corresponding to CPO architecture are still viewed as long-term shortages. Post-election, according to AiCoin data, the cryptocurrency fear and greed index surged from 34 to 50, emotions shifted from panic to neutral, reminding us to view on-chain contracts, policy signals, and industry supply and demand as a long-term game across cycles, rather than simplifying them into a single pointer for short-term market conditions at each fluctuation.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
