Water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize it Having the right path brings many benefits, while losing the right path brings few benefits It is recommended that Web3 project parties with coin issuance plans read the above two sentences carefully every day 😑 We must acknowledge that the impossible triangle in the cryptocurrency industry is the profit of individual investors, the profit of project parties, and the successful exit of related stakeholders from liquidity. However, at least the balance cannot be tilted too much - RED was suspended from being launched by Binance due to false advertising, and GPS plummeted 63% (0.151>0.0554) in three days after its launch. Has this not yet emerged from the inertia of Memecoin? America1， Binance's decision to suspend RED this time is both beautiful and decisive. We also hope that there will be a satisfactory follow-up for the GPS issue to the community. Have any relevant stakeholders maliciously sold after going online, and what were the results of the handling Let's take a look at the chip distribution of GPS before the launch of Binance. Before the launch, a total of 800 million tokens were recharged into Binance by the project party 👇 🔸 Binance related chips: -300 million for HODLer airdrop (as stated in the announcement) -200 million pieces or for marketing or other purposes (all transferred to public addresses 0x943... 37672, not yet entered the market, transaction hash) https://basescan.org/token/0x0c1dc73159e30c4b06170f2593d3118968a0dca5?a=0x94370e78b3646c1b17328f71edbff4c8a3f37672 ） 🔹 Other chips: 300 million with unknown purpose, or belonging to the project party/market maker/stakeholders In the situation where the airdrop ratio of 3% of the total amount is not too high, such a "tragic" decline is really too urgent; Both Binance and the project team, as the main participants in the storm center, seem to need to give the community an explanation