Compared to AI 'plagiarizing' human knowledge, the current situation is exactly the opposite When Midjourney first came out, artists collectively resisted because they felt their works (styles) had been plagiarized by AI; When ChatGPT was popular, there were also writers and media giants who resisted because AI plagiarized their text and infringed on their copyright. Now, with the rapid rise of AI technology, the situation has reversed. The Internet is full of AI generated content, but almost no human gives AI the corresponding right of authorship. AI did not riot, and the companies behind inventing these AI models did not demand compensation, as they granted users the right to use AI generated content for free or even commercially from the beginning. Nevertheless, I still believe that content generated entirely by AI should not be taken as one's own. In other words, at least you should inform others that the content you show them is "created" by AI. Otherwise, what is the difference between this and completely plagiarizing the labor results of AI? By extension, future AI model training must do everything possible to remove AI content pollution. Alternatively, like GPT-5, the content generated by the AI model can be directly used for training. Human knowledge has taken a back seat and entered the era of AI's self iterative evolution.