On January 23, 2026, Beijing time, the on-chain IPO issuance and financial technology platform Superstate announced the completion of $82.5 million in Series B financing, with its current Assets Under Management (AUM) reaching $1.2 billion. This is not a conceptual project still stuck in the white paper stage, but a compliant company that has been registered with the SEC in the United States and is attempting to issue "digital stocks" directly on-chain. Superstate deliberately positions itself at the intersection of traditional IPOs and on-chain capital markets, connecting with securities regulation while betting on the settlement efficiency of public chains like Ethereum and Solana. Traditional IPOs rely on underwriters, lengthy roadshows, and high costs, while on-chain securities attempt to rewrite this process using code, smart contracts, and open networks. This round of financing not only replenishes Superstate's ammunition but may also signal that the methods of company listing and financing are being pushed onto the same betting table as the on-chain market and Wall Street's traditional paths, initiating a long-term game of efficiency versus inertia.
$82.5 Million Series B: Who is Betting on On-Chain Securities
● Funding and Time Scale: On January 23, 2026, Superstate announced the completion of $82.5 million in Series B financing. At a time when the cold wave of crypto infrastructure has not fully receded, this scale itself is significant as a directional indicator. Coupled with its AUM of $1.2 billion, this funding is not "lifeline money," but rather aggressive financing aimed at expanding a larger narrative—an on-chain IPO and securities issuance platform—rather than mere survival financing.
● Lead and Participating Investors: This round was led by Bain Capital Crypto and Distributed Global, with participation from several institutions including Haun Ventures. These names span traditional private equity, crypto-native funds, and policy-sensitive venture capital. Bain Capital Crypto is backed by a well-established asset management group, while Distributed Global and Haun Ventures have long been involved in the crypto infrastructure and compliance sectors. This combination indicates that traditional capital is no longer just betting on exchanges and brokers but is starting to directly invest in the "on-chain securities" sector, which overlaps significantly with its core business.
● Scale Validation and Stage Assessment: The disclosure of $1.2 billion AUM is an important bargaining chip for Superstate in its dialogue with traditional finance, indicating that the platform has completed the funding validation from 0 to 1 at the asset management level, rather than remaining at the technical prototype stage. For entities hoping to promote on-chain IPOs, this scale serves as a credit endorsement in communications with regulators and a key indicator in negotiations with potential partners on Wall Street, proving that they are not merely a "testing ground," reinforcing their identity as a market player moving from a conceptual project to a commercial entity.
SEC Registered Company on Chain: Regulatory Easing and Framework
● The Boundary Between Digital Stocks and Tokens: As an SEC registered company, Superstate is attempting to issue "digital stocks" rather than freely transferable crypto tokens in the general sense. Its essence is to map the rights structure and registration and transfer rules of traditional securities onto the on-chain settlement and custody layer. This means that its issuance, information disclosure, and investor protection still need to comply with the securities law framework, fundamentally differing from traditional "token crowdfunding" in regulatory attributes, focusing more on rewriting the technical foundation rather than circumventing regulatory red lines.
● Pilot Rhythm and Regulatory Attitude: Research briefs indicate that since 2025, the SEC has approved 3 pilot projects for on-chain securities issuance. Superstate is promoting its business in this macro context. Regulation has gradually transitioned from initial high pressure and observation on token issuance to attempting on-chain securities pilots within a small, controllable scope. The signal released is that as long as it is traceable, auditable, and compliant within the securities law framework, the technical form can be redefined, and on-chain is not inherently excluded as a venue for issuance and settlement.
● High Compliance Threshold as a Double-Edged Sword: Choosing the SEC registration + on-chain issuance path results in a very high compliance threshold—KYC, information disclosure, and ongoing regulatory pressure will not be lighter than traditional securities. However, this also provides a "comfort zone" for traditional institutional funds: they can attempt new technical infrastructures under familiar regulatory language and legal structures. For Superstate, regulatory compliance limits its freedom in issuing to global retail investors but also builds a moat, giving it a first-mover advantage in the niche sector of "compliant on-chain securities."
Ethereum and Solana Settlement: Efficiency Commitment and Unknowns
● Basic Design of Dual-Chain Settlement: Superstate adopts a dual-chain settlement approach using Ethereum and Solana, essentially leveraging Ethereum's security and mature ecosystem while adding Solana's advantages in throughput and cost, optimizing the entire verification, clearing, and settlement path through a multi-chain architecture. The multi-chain solution allows issuers to make more nuanced trade-offs between security and efficiency, providing differentiated access and trading experiences for different types of investors through cross-chain bridging or asset mapping mechanisms.
● Potential Advantages Compared to Traditional Settlement: Compared to the traditional securities issuance and clearing system, which relies on custodians, clearinghouses, and registration agencies as multiple intermediaries, on-chain settlement is expected to achieve high automation of clearing and transfer technically, theoretically compressing the T+N settlement cycle, reducing manual reconciliation and operational risks, and squeezing out some intermediary premiums in the fee structure. For companies that frequently finance and refinance, if on-chain settlement can operate stably, it may significantly outperform the one-size-fits-all traditional IPO process in terms of issuance efficiency and flexibility.
● Key Performance Data Remains a Black Box: Currently, publicly available information does not disclose hard metrics such as specific settlement duration, on-chain transaction fee ratios, and actual cost comparisons with traditional models. These remain critical but unknown variables. Superstate's multi-chain architecture is still more at the "capability description" and technical commitment stage, and has not yet been validated through enough real securities issuances and large-scale secondary trading to confirm whether it can stably support Wall Street-level liquidity demands. Therefore, it should currently be viewed as infrastructure in experimentation rather than a proven solution superior to existing systems.
Opening Bell Platform: From Single Product to Issuance Factory
● Clear Platform Layout: According to statements cited in research briefs, "the Opening Bell platform will support more direct issuance plans," indicating that Superstate is not satisfied with merely moving a few assets it manages onto the chain but hopes to build a standardized platform for multiple issuers. Opening Bell resembles a comprehensive entity of "on-chain investment banking + registration and clearing hub," using a unified technology and compliance template to batch handle enterprises' direct issuance needs on-chain.
● Ambition to Reshape the Listing Path: The narrative released by Superstate is that "the goal is to reshape the way companies finance and go public," pointing to a systematic reconstruction of traditional IPOs, follow-on offerings, and convertible bonds. If Opening Bell can move parts or all of the roadshow, book building, issuance pricing, and registration and clearing onto the chain within acceptable regulatory limits, it theoretically has the opportunity to partially replace the expensive and cumbersome traditional IPO and follow-on paths, especially in medium-sized financing scenarios, exerting pressure on traditional investment banks.
● Potential Impact on Small and Growth Enterprises: Once the platform model is operational, for companies in the small to mid-cap, growth tech, and leading niche sectors, direct on-chain issuance may become a third path between "fully private financing" and "expensive IPOs." If issuance thresholds and fixed costs can significantly decrease, they may be able to conduct small-scale equity financing more frequently, optimize their capital structure, and attract institutional funds interested in compliant digital securities globally, potentially reshaping the financing landscape for mid- to long-tail enterprises, rather than just providing a "technologically updated" version of the NYSE or NASDAQ for giants.
Traditional Exchanges vs. On-Chain Markets: The Collision of Efficiency and Inertia
● Comparison of IPO Pain Points and On-Chain Advantages: Traditional exchange IPOs often take months to a year, involving multiple rounds of audits, regulatory inquiries, roadshows, and underwriting negotiations, with underwriting fees, legal fees, and accounting fees making up a significant portion of the cost structure. On-chain direct issuance can theoretically significantly reduce the intermediary steps of roadshows and book building, utilizing smart contracts and a transparent on-chain order book to complete part of the pricing and allocation work. However, it also faces real constraints such as investor education, insufficient brand endorsement, and limited depth in the secondary market, making it difficult to fully replace the pricing and liquidity functions of traditional IPOs in the short term.
● Compliant On-Chain Securities and ERC-3643: In terms of compliance, Superstate adopts the ERC-3643 standard for asset tokenization, which centers on embedding KYC, accredited investor thresholds, and controllable transfer rules into contract logic. In simple terms, only wallet addresses that pass identity and compliance checks can hold and transfer these "digital securities," and lock-up periods, geographic restrictions, and blacklist mechanisms can be set according to regulatory requirements. This design attempts to maintain on-chain transparency and programmability while ensuring that the circulation of securities in the secondary market remains within a controllable regulatory scope.
● Triple Game Determines Mainstreaming: Whether on-chain securities can truly become mainstream will depend on the interaction of regulatory tolerance, institutional behavioral inertia, and technological maturity. If regulation remains limited to a few pilot projects, institutions will not migrate core assets onto the chain; if institutions continue to rely on traditional investment banks and exchanges, even the most efficient on-chain infrastructure will struggle to attract top assets; and if technology frequently encounters issues in performance, security, or compliance visualization, it will reinforce the conservative preferences of regulators and institutions. Superstate and its Opening Bell platform stand at the intersection of these three forces, either leveraging a small portion of the market towards a new paradigm or being dissolved by the inertia of the existing landscape.
Financing is Just the Prelude: The Real Test of On-Chain Securities Lies Ahead
Superstate's $82.5 million Series B financing, combined with its existing $1.2 billion AUM, the SEC-led on-chain securities pilot background, multi-chain settlement architecture, and Opening Bell platform layout, all point in the same direction: on-chain securities are moving from a technical and regulatory "laboratory" to a market phase that directly competes with Wall Street's existing systems. It is no longer just a proof of concept of "can securities be issued on-chain," but a concrete competitive proposition of "can it capture part of the trading volume and issuance share in real capital bidding."
The real uncertainty lies in whether the regulatory pace will continue to ease in the next cycle or suddenly tighten due to a single event; whether the real on-chain issuance cases that emerge in the next year or two can achieve liquidity, price discovery efficiency, and user experience that are close to or even surpass traditional exchanges; and when on-chain securities begin to touch on underwriting fees, trading fees, and custody revenues, whether existing players on Wall Street will choose to cooperate, block, or directly enter the market to build their own platforms. In the next one to three years, a more foreseeable path is that small-scale pilots and specific niche industries (such as high-growth technology and internet companies familiar with the crypto ecosystem) will migrate first, gradually accumulating data and regulatory trust, before potentially reaching larger market capitalizations and broader industries.
For ordinary participants, what is more worth paying attention to now is not the grand narrative itself, but the actual transaction volume, price spread, depth, and settlement experience of each subsequent on-chain IPO or compliant digital securities issuance. Only when these specific indicators begin to stabilize and outperform traditional paths can today's $82.5 million bet on on-chain IPOs be proven not to be an expensive technological fantasy, but rather the starting point of the next generation of capital market infrastructure.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
