On February 2, 2026, Fenbushi Capital was monitored withdrawing 2432 ETH from Binance, equivalent to approximately 5.44 million USD at the time's market price. This substantial on-chain transfer quickly attracted market attention. Statistics from a single monitoring source indicate that the institution currently has a total of approximately 10,944 ETH staked, valued at about 24.48 million USD, but the related data is still in a pending further verification status. Meanwhile, on a macro level, risk assets and so-called safe-haven assets are both retreating: Bitcoin has fallen below 75,000 USD, and gold has seen a daily drop of nearly 7.9%, with market sentiment clearly tense. In this environment, Fenbushi Capital's large withdrawal from the exchange is seen as a thought-provoking allocation signal.
On-chain Interpretation of Institutional Withdrawals
● Size Positioning: The 2432 ETH withdrawn from Binance, corresponding to about 5.44 million USD, accounts for approximately 20% of the claimed total staked 10,944 ETH. This action is considered a moderately large single transaction in the institution's historical operations, neither a symbolic reallocation nor a “last-ditch” change in position structure, but rather a phased increase under an existing long-term strategy.
● Price and Rhythm: Given that ETH is currently in a downward range along with the overall market fluctuations, mainstream assets have generally retreated significantly from their highs. Choosing to withdraw a large amount of ETH while Bitcoin falls below 75,000 USD and gold drops nearly 8% in a single day demonstrates a strong characteristic of buying on dips and phased accumulation. This type of operation is not a precise bet on the bottom but rather views systematic corrections as a window to extend holding periods and lower overall holding costs.
● Implications and Limitations of Selling Pressure: From an on-chain structure perspective, funds moving out of exchanges typically means that this portion of chips temporarily exits the liquid pool available for immediate sale, helping to alleviate potential selling pressure in corresponding quantities. However, its limitations are: first, the final flow has not been confirmed; second, other whales and institutions may still replenish chips to the exchange, making the impact of a single withdrawal on overall selling pressure limited. Therefore, it is more suitable as a structural signal rather than a direct criterion for price reversal.
Funding Preferences in Habitual Staking Paths
● Operational Inertia: Twitter user @OnchainDataNerd pointed out that Fenbushi Capital's usual practice is to use most of the ETH withdrawn from exchanges for staking participation, rather than maintaining it in a wallet that can be liquidated at any time for long periods. This indicates that such withdrawals are not for short-term off-exchange trading or frequent reallocation, but rather closer to a “withdraw and lock” execution strategy, viewing the exchange as a liquidity entry point rather than a long-term custody location.
● Lock-up Preference: According to data from a single on-chain monitoring source, Fenbushi currently has a total staked amount of approximately 10,944 ETH, equivalent to about 24.48 million USD. Its main monitored address and specific staking path remain pending verification. Nevertheless, this figure itself sufficiently indicates its clear preference for converting ETH into staked assets, with chips migrating from “liquid positions” to “contractually locked positions,” reflecting a long-term strategy centered on smoothing the yield curve and capturing protocol interest rates.
● Impact of Staking on Funding Curve: Allocating ETH to staking contracts means that the institution sacrifices some liquidity and immediate selling rights for a certain period in exchange for relatively certain returns at the protocol level. In terms of capital costs, this is a typical configuration of locking time in exchange for passive interest: under the premise of manageable cash flow needs, staking returns are expected to smooth out the paper losses caused by short-term price fluctuations, but it also raises the time cost of adjusting positions. If the macro environment deteriorates sharply, the chain of withdrawing from staking and then selling will clearly lag behind directly reducing positions on the exchange.
Contrarian Accumulation Amid Bitcoin Retreat and Gold Plunge
● Severe Correction Scenario: Around February 2, 2026, BTC price fell below the 75,000 USD mark, and on-chain and off-chain data calculations showed that MicroStrategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin, faced over 900 million USD in unrealized losses, becoming a symbolic case of market risk exposure. At the same time, spot gold fell below 4,500 USD/ounce, with an intraday decline of about 7.9% (according to a single source), as traditional “safe-haven assets” and crypto assets plummeted simultaneously, deepening investors' concerns about systemic risk.
● Passive Pressure and Active Accumulation: In this environment, most traditional institutions passively endure asset price declines, reducing risk exposure through deleveraging, hedging, or waiting. In contrast, Fenbushi chose to actively increase its ETH holdings and withdraw from exchanges. This behavior reflects a higher volatility tolerance and cycle tolerance: the former tends to prioritize a robust balance sheet as a constraint, while the latter, under the assumption of manageable risk, increases long-term allocation weight during systematic correction phases, highlighting relative confidence in ETH's mid-to-long-term performance.
● Profit and Loss Range of Accumulation During High Volatility: Increasing ETH during a high-volatility phase when both Bitcoin and gold experience deep corrections means that, on one hand, if the macro environment recovers and the crypto market strengthens again, the locked low-position chips can significantly amplify upward elasticity, with staking returns combined with price rebounds forming a “price + interest” dual return; on the other hand, if risks continue to evolve into a deeper downturn, the new positions will face a larger floating loss range, and the interest earned from staking may not fully hedge against price declines, further amplifying the volatility of the overall capital net value.
Long-term Bets Under Regulatory and Tax Burdens
● Suppressive Effect of India's Tax System: Currently, India maintains a high tax rate framework of 30% income tax and 1% withholding tax (TDS) on crypto trading profits, which is widely believed to suppress domestic trading activity and cross-border liquidity. From a global perspective, such policies also hinder the participation of some compliant funds in the crypto market, prompting institutions to weigh regulatory costs and capital efficiency more cautiously in their decision-making.
● Staking Motivation Under High Pressure: Against the backdrop of ongoing regulatory and tax burdens, institutions still choose to stake ETH to lock in returns, with the underlying logic being: once they decide to hold ETH long-term within a compliant framework, converting idle positions into positions that can generate on-chain returns helps to hedge against the “losses” caused by regulatory costs and tax friction. Staking, to some extent, upgrades holding ETH from a “single price game” to a comprehensive allocation of “price + interest factors.”
● Risk Compensation and Term Impact: The returns from ETH staking are essentially a risk compensation for locking liquidity and policy uncertainty. The higher the degree of uncertainty regarding regulations and taxes, the more institutions tend to demand more substantial and sustainable on-chain returns to balance potential risks, making it more suitable for longer holding and staking periods. Conversely, if there is an expectation that future policies may significantly tighten or tax burdens may further increase, institutions will shorten staking periods and enhance liquidity preparations to mitigate the impact of “policy changes” on capital layouts.
Limits of Moving from a Single Address to a Global Signal
● Data Source and Verification Nature: It is important to emphasize that the on-chain action of Fenbushi withdrawing 2432 ETH from Binance, as well as the judgment of the cumulative staking scale of approximately 10,944 ETH, comes from a single on-chain monitoring source, and the related main monitored address is still in a pending verification status. In the absence of official disclosures and multi-source cross-verification, the above data is more suitable as a reference sample for assessing its strategic direction rather than being simply viewed as a complete and unbiased full picture.
● Representativeness of Individual Behavior: The operations of a single institution or address can reflect some institutional funding preferences and rhythms to a certain extent, but their representativeness regarding “broad institutional funding intentions” has inherent limits. Different institutions vary greatly in funding sources, compliance constraints, investment cycles, and risk preferences. In the same market environment, some may increase staking while others may choose to reduce positions for hedging, so it is inappropriate to linearly extrapolate Fenbushi's on-chain path to the entire institutional group.
● Marginal Impact on Selling Pressure and Sentiment: From the perspective of exchange structure, a single withdrawal of 2432 ETH is still a marginal volume relative to the overall ETH inventory on mainstream platforms, with limited direct impact on short-term price formation. However, as an on-chain visible behavior of “contrarian withdrawal, presumably for staking,” it is expected to have an amplifying effect on market sentiment and narrative: on one hand, some participants may interpret it as a signal of “institutions locking in positions on dips,” helping to ease panic; on the other hand, if there are no more similar actions or prices continue to weaken, this sentiment boost will quickly dissipate.
Signal of Locking in Positions on Dips or Adding at High Levels
● Strategic Inertia and Phase Significance: Integrating OnchainDataNerd's public views and current on-chain data, Fenbushi's withdrawal from the exchange and tendency to allocate ETH to staking contracts has formed a relatively stable long-term operational inertia. This round of withdrawing 2432 ETH from Binance during the simultaneous deep correction of BTC and gold appears more like a phased amplification action under its established staking strategy, continuing to strengthen its bet on the mid-to-long-term value of ETH amid systemic pressures.
● Reference Value and Limitations: In an environment of increasing macro volatility and ongoing regulatory pressure, viewing this behavior as a single “buying signal” or “trend reversal criterion” carries evident risks. Its positive significance lies in: first, indicating that there are still institutions willing to increase holdings and lock in profits during corrections; second, indirectly confirming that the ETH staking track remains attractive to some professional funds. However, the limitations are also clear—single data sources, unconfirmed flows, and inability to represent broad institutional consensus, making it more suitable as a dimension for observing sentiment and structure, rather than a core anchor for trading decisions.
● Follow-up Tracking Indicators: To determine whether this action evolves into a broader trend of “locking in positions on dips,” it is necessary to continuously track several key indicators: first, the changes in the overall ETH staking ratio and growth rate, observing whether more capital synchronously increases staking allocations; second, the ETH inventory and net inflow/outflow data of major exchanges, assessing the evolution of selling pressure and chip concentration; third, the on-chain movements of other identifiable institutional addresses, including whether similar scale withdrawal and staking behaviors occur. Only when these signals form a consistent resonance can the current single-point action be upgraded to a more persuasive periodic allocation signal.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
